infamous second son waterfront hidden camera

And at this point, it’s a significantly more elaborate conspiracy theory to posit that the video was made in a near-perfect replica of the room-except for this one comparatively glaring slip-up-than that it was just filmed in the room itself.īut then, while searching for even more images of the room, I found the real discrepancy. It’s entirely possible that any perceived discrepancy here is due to the lighting. This is, admittedly, a nonpersuasive point of rebuttal.

Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, the United States Antarctic Program, Lockheed Martin, and Halliburton. Looking through the site’s access logs, I found that visitors to have had IP addresses tied to locations including Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (which is primarily funded by the Department of Energy), the Aerospace Corporation (a federally funded nonprofit), the Swedish Tax Administration, the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, the U.K. That doesn’t mean there’s been no interest, though. I half expected to get one from Sacha Baron Cohen or some other edgelord.” So far, they have yet to be contacted by anyone claiming ownership.

If I get a takedown notice, at least then we’ll get some sort of answer as to who made this. “But mainly,” they told me over email, “it’s DMCA bait. Here’s how Trump’s outfit looked shortly before the activities described in the dossier would have occurred:Īccording to the person behind the site, they’d already owned the domain-“It seemed funny enough to justify the $2 to register it,” they explained, which made sense to me-and had merely wanted to preserve the files once they appeared. Instead, Trump wore what he wears every night and nearly always: a suit with a bold colored tie over a white dress shirt with French cuffs. Trump was photographed on the night of the 2013 Moscow Miss Universe pageant, and he was not wearing a white-tie tuxedo. And the man in the chair looked, to my eye, as if he was wearing a white tie and vest. No reason to look any further, I told myself. The one in the video was much darker than the one in the pictures. I looked up photos of the presidential suite at the Moscow Ritz-Carlton and latched onto the carpet. On the other hand, no matter how much you examine him, you can’t say it isn’t the person so many people want it to be.Īll this considered, my immediate instinct was to disprove.

It could be anyone: an actor who looks like Trump, someone wearing a Mission: Impossible Trump mask, a deepfake of Trump’s head patched in from elsewhere, or some other trick that wouldn’t survive well-lit, high-definition scrutiny. The fact that it is so blurry-the figure in the chair, jacketless in shirt sleeves, is obviously Trump, but the facial features are indistinct-introduces doubt in both directions.

Infamous second son waterfront hidden camera